Engagement Policy
Under obligations arising from the revised Shareholder Rights Directive (EU 2017/828) (“SRD II”), as applied in the UK, a firm which trades shares on regulated and comparable markets, is required to either develop and publicly disclose an engagement policy as prescribed in COBS 2.2B.6R or disclose a clear and reasoned explanation of why it has chosen not to do so.
VALEUR CAPITAL LTD (“VALEUR”) has elected to disclose its engagement policy as set out below. Further, VALEUR is also required to further disclose on an annual basis how the engagement policy has been implemented in a way that meets the requirements in COBS 2.2B.7R. VALEUR publishes its annual disclosure in Appendix 8A below.
| The role of shareholder engagement in Valeur’s investment strategy
COBS 2.2B.6R (1) |
Proxy voting and the analysis of corporate governance issues in general elements of the portfolio management services we provide to Funds that have authorized us to address these matters on their behalf when required.
Our guiding principles in carrying out proxy voting are:
Regarding the collective investment funds managed by the Company, the delegation of votes and the related right to act is established in the “Portfolio Manager Agreement” between the Company and the Collective Investment Fund. In the event of dedicated funds (single investor), this right and the related obligations are specified in the documents and agreements concerning the management mandate. In any case, the Company, when fulfilling its obligations regarding the exercise of the voting rights described above, maintains the guiding principle that each share must be for the exclusive benefit of the funds/investors. |
| Approach to ongoing monitoring of investee companies
COBS 2.2B.6R (2) |
VALEUR reviews investments in companies on an ad hoc basis against the following criteria:
Strategy Financial and non-financial performance and risk Capital structure Where companies cannot or will not use capital efficiently, they should consider returning the capital to shareholders: the capital may then be allocated to investments earning an appropriate return. Capital should not be used for value destroying acquisitions Social and environmental impact and corporate governance |
| Approach to conducting dialogue with investee companies
COBS 2.2B.6R (3) |
All dialogue with the investee companies will be conducted by the lead named analyst at the Firm via the investee company’s investor relations department wherever possible and the outcome of such dialogue will be recorded in a file note on each occasion. Any material proposals or suggestions will be discussed and agreed with portfolio managers within the Firm before they are put to investee companies. |
| Procedure for exercising voting rights and other rights attached to shares
COBS 2.2B.6R (4) |
To the extent that a client has delegated to the Firm the authority to vote proxies relating to equities, the Firm expects to fulfil its fiduciary obligation to the client by monitoring events concerning the issuer of the security and then voting the proxies in a manner that is consistent with the best interests of that client and that does not subordinate the client’s interests to its own.
To that end, the Firm has created a Proxy Voting Committee consisting of the CIO, the CEO and Compliance to consider any issues related to proxy matters. We have established effective strategies for determining when and how any voting rights held in client portfolios are to be exercised, to the exclusive benefit of the portfolio and its underlying investors concerned. The strategy includes measures and procedures for:
Absent special client circumstances or specific client policies or instructions, the Firm will vote as follows on the issues listed below:
With respect to the wide variety of social and corporate responsibility issues that are presented, the Firm’s general policy is to take a position in favour of policies that are designed to advance value for all stakeholders of the investee company. However, the SGR may waive the exercise of voting rights upon the occurrence of one or more of the following conditions:
|
| Approach to cooperating with other shareholders
COBS 2.2B.6R (5) |
On a case-by-case basis, if needed, in the interest of the investors. |
| Approach to communicating with other non-equity stakeholders
COBS 2.2B.6R (6) |
On a case-by-case basis, if needed, in the interest of the investors. |
| Procedure for managing actual and potential conflicts of interests in relation to the firm’s engagement
COBS 2.2B.6R (7) |
The Firm maintains a register of potential and actual conflicts of interest which are supplemented by a register of the outside business interests of staff members. Where the Firm faces a material conflict of interest that it is unable to manage or prevent, it is the Firm’s policy to disclose this to the client(s) concerned prior to taking any action.
To ensure that proxy votes are voted in a client’s best interest and unaffected by any conflict of interest that may exist, the Firm will vote on a proxy question that presents a material conflict of interest between the interests of a client and the interests of the Firm as follows:
|
Appendix 8A
Shareholder Rights Directive Annual Disclosure
Valeur makes the below annual disclosure under obligations arising from Article 3g(1)(b) of the revised Shareholder Rights Directive (EU 2017/828) (“SRD II”) for the period up to December 31st, 2024.
| How has Valeur’s engagement policy been implemented in a way that meets the below requirements?COBS 2.2B.5R (1)(b) |
No instances have arisen in 2024 requiring to exercise shareholders voting rights that would meaningfully impact the portfolio, We have elected not to vote in single instances where portfolio exposure where below 1% of the fund NAV. |
| General description of voting behaviour.
COBS 2.2B.7R (1) |
No instances have arisen in 2024 requiring to exercise shareholders voting rights that would meaningfully impact the portfolio, We have elected not to vote in single instances where portfolio exposure where below 1% of the fund NAV. |
| How has Valeur cast votes in the general meetings of companies in which it holds shares?
COBS 2.2B.7R (2) |
No instances have arisen in 2024 requiring to exercise shareholders voting rights that would meaningfully impact the portfolio, We have elected not to vote in single instances where portfolio exposure where below 1% of the fund NAV. |
| An explanation of Valeur’s most significant votes.
COBS 2.2B.7R (1) |
No instances have arisen in 2024 requiring to exercise shareholders voting rights that would meaningfully impact the portfolio, We have elected not to vote in single instances where portfolio exposure where below 1% of the fund NAV. |
| Valeur’s use of the services of proxy advisors.
COBS 2.2B.7R (1) |
We do not currently use proxy advisors for our pooled funds. |